ArticleJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM2025
Implementation of the Person-Centered Primary Care Measure.
Article in Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Family Medicine in Today's World: Virtual Care, Artificial Intelligence, Vaccine Hesitancy, and More.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe Person-Centered Primary Care Measure (PCPCM) is a patient assessment of their longitudinal experience of care with a clinician and care team, evaluating core functions of primary care in the health system. However, the optimal process of implementation across health systems, including how and when to administer the survey, reporting, and process improvement activities tied to survey data, has not been established.
methodsWe distributed the 11-question PCPCM experience survey to 329,450 patients empaneled across 78 primary care practices between April 2023 and January 2024. We evaluated survey completion parameters, psychometric properties, and mean responses in relationship to patient-level demographic variables.
resultsIn this large, heterogeneous system of primary care practices, the PCPCM survey was successfully distributed using the Press Ganey (South Bend, IN) platform. We found a low response rate (6.4%), but demonstrated good internal consistency, with a skew toward higher scores. PCPCM scores varied by age, sex, race, primary care clinician type, and the number of years the patient had been at their current primary care practice. Responses varied significantly by patient race, but differences were small and not uniform in direction. Black or African American patients were significantly less likely to believe that the care provided by the practice was informed by knowledge of their community, compared with all other racial groups.
conclusionsThe PCPCM was implemented successfully in a large network of primary care practices, but more work is needed to improve the response rate. Future work should focus on the use of the PCPCM for practice and clinician feedback and validation of individual PCPCM items.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.