Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41115752›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM2025

Patient Healthcare Seeking If There Were No Limits.

Serena Lee, Martha M Gonzalez, Rebecca S Etz, Kurt C Stange

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Serena LeeFrom the School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (SL); Larry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia (MMG); Larry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good and Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia (RSE); and Center for Community Health Integration, Larry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (KCS). sxl2010@case.edu.
Martha M GonzalezFrom the School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (SL); Larry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia (MMG); Larry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good and Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia (RSE); and Center for Community Health Integration, Larry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (KCS).
Rebecca S EtzFrom the School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (SL); Larry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia (MMG); Larry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good and Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia (RSE); and Center for Community Health Integration, Larry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (KCS).
Kurt C StangeFrom the School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (SL); Larry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia (MMG); Larry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good and Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia (RSE); and Center for Community Health Integration, Larry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (KCS).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOngoing changes in the operations and constraints of the health care system are likely affecting how patients make decisions about care seeking. Therefore, we analyzed data from a national survey asking people where they would seek care if they had no limits.

methodsWe conducted surveys of patient experiences and perceptions regarding primary care delivery and access during the pandemic, one of which conducted during November 15 to 23, 2021 included a question asking: "If you had no limits (such as insurance coverage, or what you could afford), what would be your first choice for handling most of your health concerns?" A multidisciplinary team analyzed responses using a 3-step process: identified categories using a grounded approach, tallied category frequencies using a template-based coding approach, and involved an auditor to search for confirming/disconfirming data. MAIN

findingsAmong 1,211 respondents with usable answers, the most frequent first preference for handling most health concerns was primary care (49.1%). Other common responses were hospital or health system (11.9%), a convenient/easily accessible source (11.6%), the current source of care (8.3%), a source that would provide quality care (8.2%), or a specialist (8.0%). Less common preferences include urgent care, clinicians with whom the respondent had a relationship, a specific procedure or treatment, self-care, alternative medicine, mental/behavioral health care, holistic/wellness/preventive medicine, or pharmacy.

conclusionA majority of respondents among a large national sample of patients preferred primary care for handling most health concerns. Given the known benefits of primary care, systems should support, rather than constrain, that preference.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health Services AccessibilityPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrimary Health CareAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient PreferenceSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesYoung AdultCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchDelivery of Health CareHealth BehaviorHealth Care SurveysHealth ServicesHealth Services ResearchPandemicsPatient SatisfactionPrimary Health CareQuality of CareSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41115752
PMCPMC12978608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.