Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41115688›Full record

Trial reportAddiction (Abingdon, England)2026

Effects of brand-matched alcoholic and alcohol-free and low-alcohol drinks adverts on drink selections: A United Kingdom-based randomised controlled trial in an experimental online supermarket.

Ru Jia, Lauren Bandy, Emma Davies, Hannah Forde, Peter Scarborough, Rachel Pechey

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ru JiaNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Medical Science Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6843-8250
Lauren BandyNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Medical Science Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Emma DaviesSchool of Psychology, Social Work and Public Health, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3577-3276
Hannah FordeNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Medical Science Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Peter ScarboroughNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Medical Science Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Rachel PecheyNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Medical Science Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

NIHR Applied Research Collaboration for Oxford and Thames ValleyNIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research CentreNIHR Oxford Health BRCPublic Health Research Programme NIHR133887Royal Society and Wellcome Trust Sir Henry Dale fellowship 222566/Z/21/ZWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 222566/Z/21/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsRestricting alcohol advertising may reduce alcohol consumption and related ill-health. However, advertisements for alcohol-free and low-alcohol drinks (NoLos) with brand-matched alcoholic versions are typically exempt from restrictions, which could lead to surrogate marketing (adverts for NoLo beverages also promoting brand-matched alcoholic options). This study measured the impact of advertisements for brand-matched NoLo beverages on product selections in a simulated online supermarket, in the UK. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND

interventionWe conducted a randomised controlled trial with 1638 UK regular alcohol consumers (aged 18-91), assigned to one of three groups: (1) alcohol adverts (n = 469), where participants viewed an advertisement (embedded within a video) for one of four alcoholic beverages; (2) NoLo adverts (n = 472), for one of four brand-matched NoLo beverages; and (3) unrelated adverts (n = 697), for batteries. Participants then selected food and drinks for a barbecue in a simulated online supermarket. MEASUREMENTS: We collected data on products selected in the simulated online supermarket (e.g. product name, category, quantity, energy). Risk of alcohol dependence was measured using the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test Consumption Questions (AUDIT-C). The primary outcome was selection (yes/no) of advertised alcoholic and NoLo products. Secondary outcomes included the selection (yes/no) of any alcoholic or NoLo products. We also examined the recall of advertised brands and products through survey questions.

findingsViewing NoLo, but not alcohol, advertisements statistically significantly increased the odds of selecting the advertised products, compared with unrelated advertisements [alcohol group: odds ratio (OR) = 1.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.03-2.53, Benjamini-Hochberg-adjusted P = 0.11; NoLo group: OR = 2.18, 95% CI = 1.24-3.91, Benjamini-Hochberg-adjusted P = 0.022]. Although the odds of selecting the alcoholic version of the advertised product were higher in those exposed to NoLo adverts vs. control (OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 0.94-2.33, Benjamini-Hochberg-adjusted P = 0.13), this association did not reach statistical significance. Fifty-nine percent of participants in all three groups recalled the advertised brand. Among those who remembered the brand of advertisement, 96% in the alcohol group also correctly recalled the advertised product, while 44% in the NoLo group reported seeing an advert for the alcoholic version of the product (X

conclusionsExposure to advertisements for brand-matched alcohol-free and low-alcohol drinks increases brand (over product) recall, but, while the direction of effects is consistent with these advertisements promoting the selection of alcoholic beverages, evidence of the impact on alcohol selection is inconclusive.

Indexed as

AdvertisingAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholic BeveragesChoice BehaviorFood MarketsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedUnited KingdomYoung Adultalcohol advertisingalcohol freebrand‐sharing advertisinglow‐alcoholNoLorandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID41115688
PMCPMC12779593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.