Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41115594›Full record

ArticleClinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases2026

Relative contributions of the ERG11

Katherine S Barker, Qing Zhang, Tracy L Peters, Jeffrey M Rybak, Joachim Morschhäuser, Christina A Cuomo, P David Rogers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Deciphering the multidrug resistance paradigm inAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
    Review
  2. UnderstandingJournal of medical microbiology · 2026
    Review
  3. ER stress selects forFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Mutations inAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katherine S BarkerDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Qing ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Tracy L PetersDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Jeffrey M RybakDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Joachim MorschhäuserInstitute of Molecular Infection Biology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Christina A CuomoDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA.
P David RogersDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. Electronic address: dave.rogers@stjude.org.

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
Mapping the genomic and molecular mechanisms of antifungal resistance in the emerging fungal pathogen Candida aurisR01AI169066 · NIAID · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI Christina A Cuomo, P. David Rogers · 2023 to 2026
$4.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI169066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCandidozyma (Candida) auris is an emerging fungal pathogen of global concern that often exhibits multidrug resistance. Of the six described C. auris clades, Clade III has been found to be nearly universally fluconazole resistant, and almost every Clade III isolate described carries a mutation leading to a VF125AL substitution in ERG11, the gene encoding the fluconazole target lanosterol 14α-demethylase, and a mutation leading to a N647T substitution in the gene encoding Mrr1a, a transcriptional regulator of the Mdr1 transporter. In this study, we aimed to determine the specific contributions of these mutations to triazole antifungal susceptibility in Clade III C. auris isolates.

methodsWe introduced the Clade III MRR1A mutation into a Clade I background using CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing. In two Clade III clinical isolates, we corrected the native MRR1A and ERG11 mutations to their wild-type sequences, as well as disrupted MDR1. Triazole susceptibilities and MDR1 gene expression were measured in all strains.

resultsIntroduction of the N647T substitution in a Clade I background increases fluconazole MIC from 2 to 4 μg/mL. Correction of MRR1A or disruption of MDR1 in each Clade III background resulted in a one-dilution decrease in fluconazole MIC (64-32 μg/mL), whereas the ERG11 correction resulted in a three-to four-dilution decrease (64 to 4-8 μg/mL) in fluconazole MIC. Correction of both mutations together resulted in a further decrease to 4 μg/mL. Similar changes were observed for voriconazole.

conclusionsOur findings show that although the MRR1A mutation makes a modest contribution, the ERG11 mutation is responsible for most of the fluconazole resistance observed in Clade III isolates. We also show that although these mutations likewise affect voriconazole susceptibility, they have no effect on itraconazole, isavuconazole, or posaconazole susceptibility, suggesting the therapeutic utility of these antifungals for infections due to Clade III C. auris isolates.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsCandida aurisDrug Resistance, FungalFluconazoleFungal ProteinsSterol 14-DemethylaseHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMutationTriazolesAntifungal AgentsFluconazoleFungal ProteinsSterol 14-DemethylaseTriazolesCandida aurisERG11FluconazoleMRR1AResistance

Identifiers

PMID41115594
PMCPMC12713649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.