Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41115267›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Improving Palliative Care in Residential Aged Care Using Telehealth: Protocol for a Realist Process Evaluation Embedded in a Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Kayla Lock, Anita M Y Goh, Katrin Gerber, Joanne Tropea, Kirsten Moore, Wen Kwang Lim

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kayla LockDepartment of Medicine - Royal Melbourne Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2357-5013
Anita M Y GohDepartment of Medicine - Royal Melbourne Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0159-5926
Katrin GerberNational Ageing Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5015-6420
Joanne TropeaDepartment of Medicine - Royal Melbourne Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5799-3977
Kirsten MooreDepartment of Medicine - Royal Melbourne Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8631-3213
Wen Kwang LimDepartment of Medicine - Royal Melbourne Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4559-2276

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP2006121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study describes the protocol for a realist process evaluation of IMPART (Improving Palliative Care in Residential Aged Care Using Telehealth), to be trialed through a pragmatic stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial in Australia. IMPART consists of 2 key intervention activities: specialist palliative support provided through telehealth and tailored staff education.

objectiveThe aims of the realist process evaluation are to (1) identify and explore the contexts and mechanisms that enable or hinder the implementation of the IMPART intervention, and (2) develop and refine a program theory to determine whether and how successful implementation of IMPART can be facilitated.

methodsWe will conduct this process evaluation in 3 phases, guided by a realist framework. First, to hypothesize an initial program theory, we will review trial documentation and literature to determine how IMPART is expected to work and identify the barriers and facilitators likely to influence implementation. To test this theory in the second phase, a case study methodology will draw on multiple data sources (qualitative and quantitative) from 10 participating residential aged care facilities. These include interviews with staff involved in implementation, data on staff engagement with training, program documentation, activity logs, action plans, and facility information. In the final phase, program theories developed from the case studies will be refined through consultation with the IMPART research team. This will inform the development of a refined program theory that provides key information about what works, for whom, how, and in what circumstances in the implementation of interventions aiming to improve palliative care in residential aged care.

resultsThis study was reviewed and approved by the Royal Melbourne Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee. The randomized controlled trial commenced in May 2023, with completion anticipated in November 2025. Funding began in January 2022. Data for the realist process evaluation will be collected between May 2023 and February 2026. As of October 2025, a total of 61 interviews have been completed. Data analysis is ongoing, and a publication describing the results will be prepared in 2026.

conclusionsApplying a realist framework to explore process outcomes allows for an in-depth inquiry into what works, for whom, how, and in what circumstances in the implementation of complex interventions aiming to improve palliative care in residential aged care. This realist process evaluation has the potential to provide transferable, context-specific findings that can support the development of meaningful policy and accelerate practice change.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12622000760774; https://tinyurl.com/2uv34unr. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/68332.

Indexed as

Homes for the AgedPalliative CareTelemedicineAgedAustraliaHumansPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicaged careend of life careimplementationpalliative careprocess evaluationrealist evaluationresidential aged caretelehealth

Identifiers

PMID41115267
PMCPMC12583945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.