ArticleAmerican journal of speech-language pathology2025
A Scoping Review of Oral Feeding Skill Development in Typically Developing Children Part II: Exploring Variability in Oral Feeding Skill Descriptions.
Article in American journal of speech-language pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Achieving Protein Requirements Through Oral Feeding in Children with Congenital Heart Disease: A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis scoping review is the second in a two-part series that aims to synthesize the literature on oral feeding skills development and to create a classification system of observable skills. Building on the findings from Part 1, this article compiles and analyzes the types of feeding skills reported across studies and proposes a framework for standardizing terminology.
methodThe review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Of the 14 studies identified in Part 1 that focused on feeding skill development, 11 included unique skill descriptions. These skills were coded and categorized into three main schemes: texture, oral function, and swallowing phase. Overlapping or redundant skills were critically assessed for their relevance and applicability.
resultsA total of 107 feeding skills were identified, revealing considerable variability in how skills are defined and reported. Categorization by texture, oral function, and swallowing phase highlighted key gaps and inconsistencies in the literature and opportunities for further investigation.
conclusionsThe development of a standardized observational measure, grounded in a core set of feeding skills encompassing texture, oral function, and swallowing phases, would be a valuable resource for clinicians and researchers alike. This framework could improve consistency in assessing feeding development, deepen understanding of underlying physiology, and enable more accurate identification of atypical feeding skills. Future work will aim to refine this skill set to inform the creation of tools for both clinical and research applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.