Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41115250›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2025

Effectiveness of Telephone Interventions for the Management of Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia in the Community: Systematic Review.

Angela Cebolla Sousa, Geva Greenfield, Pallavi Nair, Reham Aldakhil, Judith Udoyeh, Manisha Karki, Aos Alaa, Eva Riboli-Sasco, Austen El-Osta, Ana Luisa Neves and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Angela Cebolla SousaDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, 90 Wood Ln, London, W12 0BZ, United Kingdom, +44 20 7589 5111.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-7776-0604
Geva GreenfieldDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, 90 Wood Ln, London, W12 0BZ, United Kingdom, +44 20 7589 5111.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9779-2486
Pallavi NairDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, 90 Wood Ln, London, W12 0BZ, United Kingdom, +44 20 7589 5111.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2452-1874
Reham AldakhilDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, 90 Wood Ln, London, W12 0BZ, United Kingdom, +44 20 7589 5111.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6975-3858
Judith UdoyehDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, 90 Wood Ln, London, W12 0BZ, United Kingdom, +44 20 7589 5111.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-0400-1713
Manisha KarkiSelf-Care Academic Research Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6996-8915
Aos AlaaSelf-Care Academic Research Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4757-2562
Eva Riboli-SascoSelf-Care Academic Research Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9922-9125
Austen El-OstaSelf-Care Academic Research Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8772-4938
Ana Luisa NevesDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, 90 Wood Ln, London, W12 0BZ, United Kingdom, +44 20 7589 5111.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7107-7211
Benedict HayhoeDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, 90 Wood Ln, London, W12 0BZ, United Kingdom, +44 20 7589 5111.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2645-6191

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Most people living with dementia experience behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), leading to poor quality of life and hospitalizations and causing a significant burden for informal caregivers and health care systems, with a global lack of equitable support to manage these symptoms in the community. Telephone interventions can potentially improve the accessibility and flexibility of long-term dementia support. Objective: This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of telephone interventions in managing BPSD for community-dwelling patients with dementia and their informal caregivers, and thereby reducing BPSD-related hospitalizations. Methods: A systematic search of 4 databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo, and SCOPUS) was conducted. The authors included studies with telephone interventions with no blended component (ie, other technologies or in-person portion) and outcomes assessing the impact of these interventions on people with dementia, informal caregivers, and hospitalizations using quantitative measures. The risk of bias of the studies was measured using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute assessment tools. Findings were analyzed applying a thematic synthesis approach. Results: Of 4355 studies screened in 2024, 12 met the inclusion criteria. Studies were conducted in 5 high-income countries, and the majority were randomized controlled trials, with 2 non-randomized controlled trials and 2 pre-post intervention studies. Interventions included telephone coaching calls, psychosocial and educational support calls, and online platforms. Most studies showed a reduction in BPSD and BPSD-related burden; however, the certainty of this evidence was rated as low according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) analysis. In total, 9 studies reported reduced BPSD, and 5 studies showed a statistically significant decrease, while 4 studies indicated significant improvements in BPSD-related caregiver burden. One study considered BPSD-related hospital admissions, reporting a statistically significant reduction in admission rates. Conclusions: Telephone interventions delivered through psychosocial and educational calls and online platforms are promising tools for reducing BPSD-related caregiver burden. Personalized telephone interventions, including patients and informal caregivers in the treatment plan, may improve behavioral and psychological symptoms in patients with dementia. However, the certainty of evidence for both outcomes was low; therefore, these findings should be interpreted with caution. To strengthen the evidence base and assess the global applicability of such interventions, high-quality studies-particularly in low- and middle-income countries-are needed. Future research should incorporate longer follow-up periods, cost-effectiveness analyses, and greater consistency in intervention design and outcome measurement to better inform clinical practice and policy.

Indexed as

DementiaTelephoneCaregiversHospitalizationHumansQuality of LifeTelemedicinebehavioral and psychological symptoms of dementiaBPSDcaregiver burdenhospitalizationssystematic reviewtelephone interventions

Identifiers

PMID41115250
PMCPMC12536943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.