ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
SysML: adaptive recommendation system for heterogeneous biomedical data preprocessing and modeling workflows.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid growth of high-dimensional omics datasets in biomedical research has created an urgent need for computational frameworks that are both robust and adaptable to diverse data complexities. Although a wide range of specialized tools and algorithms are available, researchers often rely on trial-and-error approaches to select suitable analytical workflows, compromising both efficiency and reproducibility. In this study, we systematically benchmarked hundreds of algorithms-preprocessing combinations across three common biomedical data challenges, including small sample sizes, missing values, and class imbalance. Our results show that tree-based models (e.g. Gradient Boosting Decision Tree, XGBoost, and Random Forest) consistently perform well in scenarios involving small-sample and missing-data, while partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) is more effective in addressing imbalanced classes. Unsupervised cluster methods such as K-means and Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN) remain robust under moderate missingness, but their performance declines when missingness exceeds 10%. To support data-driven decision-making, we developed SysML, a web-based platform that recommends data-adaptive workflows based on dataset-specific characteristics. Validated on multiple real-world biomedical datasets, SysML demonstrated improvements in both model performance and workflow efficiency. Our findings underscore that adaptive data preprocessing, rather than algorithm choice alone, is critical for achieving reliable and reproducible machine learning applications in biomedicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.