Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41115200›Full record

Trial reportProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

A national randomized controlled trial of the impact of public Montessori preschool at the end of kindergarten.

Angeline S Lillard, David Loeb, Juliette Berg, Maya Escueta, Karen Manship, Alison Hauser, Emily D Daggett

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A national randomized controlled trial of the impact of public Montessori preschool at the end of kindergarten.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Trial
  2. Educating minds with generative AI.Communications psychology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Angeline S LillardDepartment of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904.ORCID 0000-0001-9697-6611
David LoebDivision of Policy, Organizations, Leadership, and Systems, Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.ORCID 0009-0003-6564-3867
Juliette BergAmerican Institutes for Research, Chapel Hill, NC 27517.
Maya EscuetaAmerican Institutes for Research, Chapel Hill, NC 27517.
Karen ManshipAmerican Institutes for Research, Chapel Hill, NC 27517.
Alison HauserAmerican Institutes for Research, Chapel Hill, NC 27517.
Emily D DaggettDepartment of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904.ORCID 0009-0009-6229-1820

Funding

Arnold Ventures (AV) 23-10339Brady Education Foundation (BEF) NA999U.S. Department of Education, Institute for Education Sciences R305A180181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although seminal studies from the early 1960s suggested quality preschool can have lasting positive effects, agreement is lacking on the efficacy of different preschool models. The Montessori model is longstanding but lacks rigorous impact studies; prior random lottery studies included just one or two schools, among other compromises. Here, we report on end-of-kindergarten (age 5 to 6) impacts from a national study of public Montessori preschool. We compared children offered a Montessori seat via competitive lottery admission processes at one of 24 public Montessori schools at age 3 ([Formula: see text]) to children not offered a seat ([Formula: see text]), estimating Montessori impacts with intention-to-treat and complier average causal effect models. Roughly half of the treatment sample still attended Montessori for kindergarten. Although there were no notable impacts at the end of PK3 or PK4, at the end of kindergarten, controlling for baseline scores and demographics, Montessori children had significantly higher reading, short-term memory, theory of mind, and executive function scores. Intention-to-treat effect sizes exceeded a fifth of a SD, considered large in field-based school research [M. A. Kraft,

Indexed as

SchoolsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMemory, Short-Termchildhood educationrandomized controlled trialschool outcomes

Identifiers

PMID41115200
PMCPMC12582262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.