ReviewAnnual review of medicine2026
Contemporary Treatment Strategies in Pulmonary Hypertension: A Clinician's Guide.
Review in Annual review of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The role of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 in pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a complex condition characterized by pulmonary vasculopathy and progressive right ventricular dysfunction. Recent advances have reshaped PH management, including refined risk stratification, improved patient phenotyping, and the discovery of novel therapeutics. In alignment with the recommendations of the Seventh World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension, we summarize updated treatment strategies and emerging therapies, such as sotatercept, while acknowledging research gaps and areas of clinical equipoise. This practical, evidence-based review explores treatment across all groups of PH to inform clinical decision-making, improve long-term patient outcomes, and address both current and future challenges in PH management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.