ReviewStereotactic and functional neurosurgery2025
New and Old Targets: Evolving Framework for Personalized DBS in Refractory Epilepsy.
Review in Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A motor thalamic site in humans that suppresses involuntary breathing without awareness.Journal of neurophysiology · 2026Article
- A comprehensive review of deep brain stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDrug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) remains a major therapeutic challenge, and neuromodulation has emerged as an essential palliative option for patients who are not candidates for resective or ablative surgery. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation are now widely used in clinical practice. SUMMARY: Randomized trials and long-term studies demonstrate durable seizure reductions and improvements in quality of life, although patient and target selection, device programming, and adverse effects remain key considerations. Traditional DBS targets such as the anterior and centromedian thalamic nuclei and hippocampus are those supported by robust evidence, while emerging targets including the pulvinar, subthalamic nucleus, globus pallidus internus, cerebellum, and white-matter tracts require further investigation. Multitarget and multidevice approaches are increasingly reported for highly refractory cases, reflecting the complexity of epileptogenic networks and a drive to improve results. Advances in neuroimaging, biomarkers, adaptive stimulation, and preoperative invasive recording of thalamocortical circuits ("thalamic stereoelectroencephalography") promise to refine target selection and optimize outcomes; but controversies and challenges remain. KEY MESSAGE: Neuromodulation as a rapidly evolving field that offers meaningful seizure control and quality-of-life improvements for patients with otherwise intractable epilepsy. Network principles, advanced imaging, invasive thalamic recording, biomarkers, and multimodal approaches promise a more personalized approach to selecting traditional and emerging DBS targets for epilepsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.