SynthesisLasers in medical science2025
Effect of Er: YAG laser dentin pretreatment on composite bonding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Er:YAG laser irradiation versus conventional surface treatments: a pull-out bond strength study on glass fiber posts.Lasers in medical science · 2026Article
- Effects of SWEEPS Laser-Activated Irrigation and Diode Laser Irradiation on Void Formation and Bond Strength of a New Premixed Calcium Silicate Sealer, BioRoot Flow-An In Vitro Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effects and Properties of Deproteinizing Methods in Dentin: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review aims to systematically evaluate the effect of Er: YAG laser dentin pretreatment on the shear bond strength (SBS) of composite resin, by comparing it with conventional mechanical caries removal and etch-and-rinse techniques. Two researchers independently searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE for literature (January 2020-December 2024), identifying 13 in vitro studies. A meta-analysis (95% confidence interval) was then conducted using RevMan 5.3. While Er: YAG laser showed comparable SBS to mechanical preparation (P = 0.05), it underperformed etch-and-rinse (P < 0.00001). Er: YAG laser pretreatment increased SBS by 4.46 MPa compared to untreated dentin (P < 0.00001). Notably, a statistically significant enhancement in SBS was noted when combining Er: YAG laser with etch-and-rinse, significantly enhancing SBS over laser treatment alone (P < 0.00001). High heterogeneity (I²>50%) was attributed to variations in parameter settings of Er: YAG laser, types of samples (primary/permanent teeth), and diversity of adhesive systems. Er: YAG laser can achieve equivalent SBS with conventional mechanical tooth preparation, but underperforms etch-and-rinse when used alone. Combinational application with etch-and-rinse significantly improves bonding performance without markedly influencing bonding failure modes. This conclusion is limited by high heterogeneity and in vitro study designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41114916What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.