ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2025
A non-contact blood pressure measurement method based on face video.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Blood pressure is an essential indicator of cardiovascular health in the human body, and regular and accurate blood pressure measurement is essential for preventing cardiovascular diseases. The emergence of photoplethysmography (PPG) and the advancement of machine learning offers new opportunities for noninvasive blood pressure measurement. This paper proposes a non-contact method for measuring blood pressure using face video and machine learning. This method extracts facial remote photoplethysmography (RPPG) signals from face video captured by a camera, and enhances the signal quality of RPPG through a set of filtering processes. The blood pressure regression model is constructed using the extreme gradient boosting tree (XGBoost) method to estimate blood pressure from RPPG signals. This approach achieved accurate blood pressure measurement, with a measurement error of 4.8893 ± 6.6237 mmHg for systolic pressure and 4.0805 ± 5.5821 mmHg for diastolic pressure. Experimental results show that this method fully complies with the American Medical Instrumentation Association (AAMI).Our proposed method has minor errors in predicting the systolic and diastolic blood pressures and achieves grade A evaluation for both systolic and diastolic blood pressures according to the British Hypertension Society (BHS) standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41114895What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.