SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Effectiveness of steroid intra-articular injections on functioning in children and adolescents affected by juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review.
Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Live viral measles-mumps-rubella revaccination and varicella vaccination in children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- The Long-Term Clinical and Radiographic Evolution of Temporomandibular Joint Involvement in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Narrative Review and 15-Year Follow-Up Case Report.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Temporomandibular disorders in children and adolescents: an underexplored condition in need of developmentally informed diagnostic guidance.Pain management · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionJuvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common rheumatic disease of childhood, and steroid intra-articular injections are a fundamental treatment modality among local therapeutic interventions. The aim of this systemic review was to assess the scientific evidence on the effectiveness and safety of intra-articular corticosteroids (IACS) injections, focusing on a comparative examination of the different therapeutic options. MATERIAL AND
methodsPubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched from the inception until February 25, 2025, to identify observational studies presenting participants with a diagnosis of JIA, IACS injections for joints affected by arthritis as interventions, and clinical or radiological assessment of arthritis as outcomes.
conclusionsFindings from this systematic review suggested that IACS injections might be effective in improving arthritis in patients affected by JIA, with good evidence of safety. Moreover, the review underlines a higher efficacy of triamcinolone hexacetonide among corticosteroids used for injections. Further studies with a higher level of evidence and more representative samples should be conducted. What is Known: • Juvenile idiopathic arthritis is the most prevalent chronic rheumatic condition in childhood and represents a major cause of disability. • The management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis involves a variety of therapeutic modalities, among which intra-articular corticosteroid injections. WHAT IS NEW: • Intra-articular corticosteroid injections induce rapid symptom control and prolonged remission in a substantial proportion of patients. • Among different types of corticosteroids, triamcinolone hexacetonide is more effective in prolonging remission duration in JIA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.