Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41114775›Full record

SynthesisSpine deformity2026

Comparison Between stable sagittal vertebra (SSV) and first lordotic vertebra (FLV) instrumentation for prevention of distal junctional kyphosis in Scheuermann disease: an updated systematic review.

Aman Verma, Rahul Baishya, Anil Kumar, Vibhor Abrol, Kaustubh Ahuja, Bhaskar Sarkar, Pankaj Kandwal

Abstract readSystematic ReviewComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Spine deformity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aman VermaDepartment of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, 249203, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2400-1086
Rahul BaishyaDepartment of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, 249203, India.
Anil KumarDepartment of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, 249203, India.
Vibhor AbrolDepartment of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, 249203, India.
Kaustubh AhujaDepartment of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, 249203, India.
Bhaskar SarkarDepartment of Trauma Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, 249203, India.
Pankaj KandwalDepartment of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, 249203, India. pankajkandwal27@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8801-6909

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScheuermann kyphosis (SK) is a spinal deformity characterized by exaggerated kyphosis, frequently requiring surgical correction. Selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) is critical in optimizing outcomes, with options including the stable sagittal vertebra (SSV) and first lordotic vertebra (FLV). This systematic review evaluates the clinico-radiological outcomes and complications associated with SSV and FLV as LIVs.

methodsA systematic review were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Seven studies comprising 311 patients (142 in the SSV group and 169 in the FLV group) were included. Outcomes analyzed included pre- and postoperative radiographic parameters (kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, sagittal balance), correction rates, incidence of distal junctional kyphosis (DJK), and revision surgery for DJK. Statistical analysis used Review Manager 5.4 with heterogeneity assessed using I

resultsPre- and postoperative kyphosis was significantly higher in the SSV group, while lumbar lordosis and sagittal balance were comparable. Although the correction rates were similar between groups, the incidence of DJK was significantly higher in the FLV group (OR 0.20, p = 0.04). Sensitivity analysis revealed that after removing the most heterogeneous study, the difference in DJK incidence was no longer statistically significant. Revision surgeries for DJK remained significantly higher in the FLV group (OR 0.26, p = 0.01).

conclusionFusion to SSV may reduce the incidence of DJK and revision surgery compared to FLV, with comparable radiological outcomes. However, these findings were sensitive to study heterogeneity, and the significance of DJK difference disappeared after sensitivity analysis, highlighting the need for further prospective studies with larger sample sizes to strengthen the evidence.

Indexed as

KyphosisLordosisLumbar VertebraeScheuermann DiseaseSpinal FusionHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRadiographyReoperationThoracic VertebraeTreatment OutcomeDistal junctional kyphosisFirst lordotic vertebraFLVLIVSagittal stable vertebraScheuermann kyphosisSSV

Identifiers

PMID41114775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.