ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2025
Tensions Within Incentives, Altruism, and Trust in Clinical Trial Participation: Perspectives From African American and Black Caribbean Patients and Clinical Research Coordinators Who Recruit Them.
Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transforming patient recruitment in clinical trials: Communication training to manage uncertainties about risks and benefits.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Digital Tools and Strategies for Engaging Patients in Cancer Clinical Trials.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study employs the Integrated Model of Behavioral Prediction (IMBP) to investigate factors that influence African American and Black Caribbean patients' decisions to participate in clinical trials and research studies. It also offers recommendations for improving clinical trial recruitment processes through targeted interventions. Nine focus groups (N = 48 participants) involving patients and clinical research coordinators (CRCs) were conducted. Thematic analysis was used to compare perspectives, revealing salient attitudes, beliefs, perceived norms, and perceived control regarding clinical trial participation. Findings indicate that both patients and CRCs share similar positive (e.g., personal relevance and altruism) and negative (e.g., medical mistrust and health risks) outcome beliefs. Notably, financial incentives emerged as a double-edged sword-while they motivated some participants, they repelled others who perceived them negatively. This underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of community values and clear communication about the purpose of incentives. Insights from patient focus group discussions about their social networks highlighted community-level concerns regarding severe health consequences and mistrust in medical research, which impacted their normative beliefs. Additionally, concerns about clinical trial features influenced participants' control beliefs. These insights suggest that addressing both motivational and control factors sensitively can enhance intervention messages. Ultimately, these findings can inform training programs to improve communication strategies for CRCs, aiming to boost recruitment of African American and Black Caribbean populations into clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41114765What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.