ArticleJournal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines2026
The spectrum of communication abilities in children with 12 rare neurodevelopmental disorders: a qualitative study with caregivers.
Article in Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Establishing meaningful score differences for the observer-reported communication ability (ORCA) measure using the scale judgment approach with caregivers of individuals with Angelman syndrome.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOur aim was to update an existing model of communication ability for children with rare neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) by centring caregiver and family perspectives. This project is part of a larger initiative to improve the measurement of communication ability for these children in the context of clinical trials.
methodsWe conducted concept elicitation interviews with purposively selected clinical experts and caregivers of children with 12 NDDs, focusing on a broad definition of communication ability based on the Observer-Reported Communication Ability (ORCA) measure, which is inclusive of different communication modalities and covers expressive, receptive and pragmatic communication concepts. Content-based and thematic analysis was performed on the qualitative data.
resultsAltogether, 115 interviews were conducted with caregivers across the 12 NDDs and with 9 clinicians. Commonly mentioned concepts across NDDs included requesting an object, refusing an object, responding to familiar directions and seeking attention. There was notable heterogeneity within and across NDD groups in terms of the specific communication behaviours described for each communication concept. One common example was requesting; children used verbal speech, gestures, sign language, eye gaze, body movements and augmentative and assistive communication to ask for what they wanted. Novel communication concepts identified that were not part of the existing model were (1) feelings, emotions, and bodily sensations, (2) commenting on likes and dislikes, and (3) communicating and understanding humour.
conclusionsCaregivers offered a detailed and nuanced picture of their child's day-to-day communication. There was a considerable overlap between the communication concepts discussed by caregivers in the interviews and the existing conceptual model of communication ability. Some newly identified concepts underscore the need for further adaptation of the model and subsequent validation of any clinical outcome assessment before communication ability can be confidently measured for these individuals in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.