ArticlePain2026
Preclinical assay of the effects of lacosamide, pregabalin, and tapentadol on the rat N1 spinal somatosensory evoked potential.
Article in Pain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractThe high failure rate in translating novel analgesics into the clinic has highlighted the need for more translatable biomarkers of analgesic target engagement. The N13 component of spinal somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) has been proposed as a biomarker of spinal nociceptive processing in humans, but it is not known whether this can be back translated into rodents. Tapentadol, lacosamide, and pregabalin were used as pharmacological probes to assess the sensitivity of spinal SEPs to drug action. In anaesthetised, naïve rats (n = 44), a multielectrode silicon probe was inserted into the L4 spinal cord to record SEPs from the dorsal horn after electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve. At baseline, the N1 component (rodent equivalent of the human N13) had an amplitude of 1.33 ± 0.07 mV at a latency of 4.6 ± 0.2 milliseconds after low-intensity stimulation (average 0.32 mA), with an intensity-dependent amplitude increase into the noxious range (0.4-3.2 mA). The N1 amplitude was significantly reduced by 10 mg/kg tapentadol (40.2 ± 12.5% vs vehicle 96.2 ± 8.0%) and 30 mg/kg lacosamide (46.3 ± 20.9% lacosamide vs vehicle 115 ± 5.9%) at 60 minutes after intraperitoneal administration. Tapentadol also reduced the N1 amplitude in the noxious range. Lacosamide increased the stimulus current required to evoke the half maximal N1 response (EC50), without reducing the maximum N1 amplitude in the noxious range. Pregabalin (at any dose up to 30 mg/kg) did not modulate the N1 amplitude. These results show that the spinal N1 is differentially modulated in a way that reflects distinct mechanisms of analgesic action consistent with it being a translatable biomarker of target engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.