Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41114416›Full record

ReviewPrzeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review2025

Tamoxifen treatment in breast cancer: diagnostic methods for endometrial changes.

Aleksandra I Kamińska, Karolina Piecak, Paweł Milart, Piotr Czuczwar, Tomasz Paszkowski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aleksandra I Kamińska2nd Department of Gynecology Medical University of Lublin, Poland.
Karolina Piecak3rd Department of Gynecology Medical University of Lublin, Poland.
Paweł Milart3rd Department of Gynecology Medical University of Lublin, Poland.
Piotr Czuczwar3rd Department of Gynecology Medical University of Lublin, Poland.
Tomasz Paszkowski3rd Department of Gynecology Medical University of Lublin, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to review publications on the early, most accurate diagnosis of pathological changes in the endometrium, which occur during and after tamoxifen (TAM) therapy for breast cancer (BC). Accurate diagnosis of potential endometrial lesions is essential to make correct decisions regarding the necessity of adjuvant therapy with TAM. MEDLINE (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed), EMBASE (http://www.embase.com) and Scopus (http://www.scopus.com) databases were searched using the following MeSH terms in titles and abstracts: ("tamoxifen endometrial hyperplasia" OR "tamoxifen endometrial pathology" OR "endometrial pathology tamoxifen"). No language restriction was used in the literature search. The search was limited to studies in humans. The results of an ultrasound investigation of the endometrium in asymptomatic BC patients receiving TAM should be interpreted with caution. An overdiagnosis of endometrial abnormalities, and the consequent unnecessary invasive diagnostic procedures could discourage some patients from continuing the adjuvant treatment with TAM, putting them at increased risk of recurrent BC. There is no evidence that patients receiving adjuvant TAM therapy could benefit from a screening program based on the ultrasound examination alone. Asymptomatic BC patients on adjuvant TAM-treatment should not be submitted routinely to ultrasound examination or biopsy, but encouraged to report any abnormal vaginal bleeding promptly.

Indexed as

breast cancerendometrial polypsrisk factorstamoxifenultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID41114416
PMCPMC12529531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.