ArticlePrzeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review2025
Prevalence, intention to use, and factors associated with the decision to use contraceptives among Peruvian women aged 40 to 49 years.
Article in Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The use of contraceptive methods (CM) in women aged 40 to 49 years is often underestimated, despite the risk of unplanned pregnancies. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence and associated factors of CM use among Peruvian women in this age group. Material and methods: An analytical, cross-sectional study was conducted based on secondary data from the 2023 Demographic and Family Health Survey (ENDES). Women aged 40 to 49 years who were neither pregnant nor menopausal were included. Sociodemographic, gynecologic-obstetric, and intimate partner violence variables were analyzed with adjustments for complex survey design. Results: The prevalence of CM use was 63.06%. The most commonly used methods were female sterilization (26.73%) and injectable contraceptives (15.46%). Contraceptive method use was higher among women aged 40-44 years, those who were married or cohabiting, and those with more children. Lower use was associated with the desire for more children, lack of knowledge about the ovulatory cycle, and a history of intimate partner violence. Among women not using CM, 54.22% expressed an intention to use them in the future, mainly favoring injectable methods or condoms. The most frequent reasons for non-use were infrequent sexual activity, perceived infertility, and not being in a relationship. Discussion: Contraceptive methods used in this group are influenced by personal, relational, and contextual factors. Violence and limited partner involvement negatively affect its adoption. Conclusions: It is necessary to strengthen personalized counseling strategies, reduce gender inequalities, and promote shared contraceptive responsibility among women of advanced reproductive age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.