ReviewPrzeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review2025
Are statin side effects dependent on sex? A narrative review.
Review in Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficacy and Safety of Statins in MASLD and Other Chronic Liver Diseases.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Statins are the first-line treatment for dyslipidemia, which is a major modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease. One of the main problems in the dyslipidemia treatment is the frequently reported discontinuation of statins, mainly due to side effects of statins. The aim of the study was to summarize current knowledge on, and comprehensively discuss, the lower adherence to statins among women than men, and to assess whether gender is associated with the incidence of statin side effects. A narrative review was performed using data from articles found in a search of PubMed and Scopus databases using the terms related to statin adherence and statin adverse events by gender. Women are less adherent to statin therapy than men. Statin adverse events and statin intolerance appear to be the main cause of poor adherence to statin treatment. Women have been found to be more likely than men to stop or switch their statin therapy because of side effects, were less likely than men to perceive statins as safe or effective, and were more likely to report discontinuing statins because of adverse effects. Female sex has also been identified as a risk factor for statin intolerance. The reports reviewed in the manuscript indicate a higher prevalence of SAMS and new-onset diabetes among women than men. The risk also increases with age and is dose-dependent. Women have also been found to be more susceptible to the nocebo and drucebo effects of statins. Greater awareness of gender-specific side effects may lead to better tailoring of therapy and consequently to better adherence to statins among women, and thus the achievement of therapeutic goals in finally reducing cardiovascular risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.