ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2025
Impact of Case-based Learning on Critical Thinking in Clinical Decision-making Among Student Nurses of Kampala International University, Uganda.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sustained Improvements in Student Outcomes Following Integration of Clinical Case Narratives in Veterinary Microbiology Curriculum.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Application of mind mapping combined with case-based learning model using simulated clinical cases in nursing education.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of Case-based Learning on Critical Thinking in Clinical Decision-making Among Student Nurses of Kampala International University, Uganda.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Case-based learning (CBL) is a student-centered pedagogy that introduces students to real-life scenarios by presenting an authentic case, mirroring situations encountered in clinical practice. It serves as a bridge between theoretical knowledge and practical applications in nursing practice, fostering development of critical thinking skills in clinical decision-making by providing practical and immersive learning experiences to students. This study examined the impact of CBL on critical thinking in clinical decision-making among student nurses at Kampala International University (KIU), Uganda. Methodology: -The study used descriptive design with criterion purposive sampling. 28 students nurses consented and participated in the study. The procedure involved CBL pedagogy, implemented using framework for teaching that was adopted and adapted by researchers and prepared instructional content on "Anemia in Pregnancy". The instrument for data collection was the California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST) questionnaire (34-point scale). Collected data were analyzed using percentages, descriptive statistics and ANOVA for sub-scale scores with a significance Results: Very few (7.1%) participants had strong, whereas majority (92.9%) had superior overall CCTST scores. Participants' CCTST total mean score was 27.39, sub-scale analysis 5.79, evaluation 3.96, inference 5.64, deductive reasoning 5.54, and inductive reasoning 6.46 as their mean scores. CBL was a statistically significant factor influencing participants' scores in analysis ( Conclusion: As a pedagogy, CBL has an excellent impact on KIU student nurses' critical thinking in clinical decision-making, as shown by study findings. However, there is a need to use more than one student-centered pedagogy to transfer adequate knowledge in curriculum to student nurses and strengthen clinical teaching to enhance their clinical management skills were recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.