Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41114401›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in food science2025

Recovery and characterisation of quinoa protein via neutral to alkaline extraction: protein profiles and heat-induced aggregation behaviour.

Hao Cui, Debashree Roy, Siqi Li, Trevor S Loo, Qing Guo, Aiqian Ye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Extraction of Phenolic-Rich Fractions fromFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hao CuiRiddet Institute, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand.
Debashree RoyRiddet Institute, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand.
Siqi LiRiddet Institute, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand.
Trevor S LooSchool of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, 4474, New Zealand.
Qing GuoCollege of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Aiqian YeRiddet Institute, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of extraction pH (pH 7-11) on the yield, composition, protein profile and properties of quinoa protein isolate (QPI), including solubility, interfacial tension and heat-induced aggregation. Extraction pH considerably influenced protein yield, purity and solubility, with alkaline conditions promoting higher protein yield (from 27.4 % to 39.5 % as extraction pH increased from pH 7 to pH 11) but lower purity (from 89.7 % to 85.1 %) owing to the co-precipitation of carbohydrates. Sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis combined with liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry revealed major protein profile in quinoa protein, confirming the abundance of 11S globulin. Moreover, extraction pH affected the solubility over a broad range of pH, interfacial properties and heat-induced aggregation behaviour of QPI. QPI extracted at pH 9 exhibited better solubility and better interfacial tension reduction capability but lower heat stability compared with QPI extracted at pH 11. Results from this study provided useful information and essential insights into the utilisation of quinoa proteins in various food applications.

Indexed as

AggregationAlkaline extractionFunctionalityProtein compositionQuinoa protein

Identifiers

PMID41114401
PMCPMC12529351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.