ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Next-generation sequencing-based genomic profiling of advanced soft tissue and bone sarcomas.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Presence of IDH2 and TP53 mutations significantly reduces survival of patients with chondrosarcoma.Cancer · 2026Article
- Molecular Characterization of Soft Tissue Sarcomas Using RNA-Based Next-Generation Sequencing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Editorial for Special Issue "Linking Genomic Changes with Cancer in the NGS Era, 2nd Edition".Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sarcomas are rare mesenchymal tumors classified into soft tissue (STS) and bone sarcomas. Despite advances in treatment, the 5-year survival rate for metastatic disease remains low. There is still limited evidence regarding the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS). Aim: To identify targetable genomic alterations that may play a crucial role in sarcoma treatment where therapeutic options are limited. Study design: Results: Genomic profiling using four different NGS kits identified a total of 223 genomic alterations across the cohort. Genomic alterations were detectable in 90.1% of patients, with the most common types being copy number amplifications (26.9%) and deletions (24.7%). In addition, actionable mutations were identified in 22.2% of patients, rendering them eligible for FDA-approved targeted therapies. The most common alterations were found in Conclusion: The high proportion of patients eligible for targeted therapies identified underscores the critical need to integrate NGS-derived genetic insights into clinical practice to improve survival rates and treatment outcomes through more tailored therapeutic approaches for each individual. NGS also led to a reclassification of diagnosis in four patients, demonstrating its utility not only in therapeutic decision-making but also as a powerful diagnostic tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.