Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41114359›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Case Report: Preoperative ultrasonographic diagnosis of accessory cavitated uterine malformation: a case series report and narrative review.

Tingting Shen, Hongxia Yuan, Hong Cao, Junhong Liu, Xiangling Duan, Shasha Chen, Rong Tian, Xingxing Duan

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tingting ShenDepartment of Ultrasonic Medicine, Changsha Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Changsha, China.
Hongxia YuanDepartment of Ultrasonic Medicine, Changsha Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Changsha, China.
Hong CaoDepartment of Ultrasonic Medicine, Changsha Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Changsha, China.
Junhong LiuDepartment of Ultrasonic Medicine, Changsha Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Changsha, China.
Xiangling DuanDepartment of Ultrasonic Medicine, Changsha Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Changsha, China.
Shasha ChenDepartment of Ultrasonic Medicine, Changsha Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Changsha, China.
Rong TianDepartment of Ultrasonic Medicine, Changsha Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Changsha, China.
Xingxing DuanDepartment of Ultrasonic Medicine, Changsha Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Accessory cavitated uterine malformation/mass (ACUM) is an extremely rare uterine malformation that is frequently misdiagnosed preoperatively. This study presents three ACUM cases accurately diagnosed by preoperative ultrasonography in our hospital. Through a comprehensive literature review, we systematically summarize its characteristic sonographic findings and key points for differential diagnosis, aiming to enhance sonographers' recognition of ACUM and improve the accuracy of preoperative diagnoses. Materials and methods: We collected three ACUM cases diagnosed in our hospital from January 2023 to April 2025. The general clinical information, ultrasound and radiological findings, pathological reports, and surgical records were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 13 previous literature reports, including a total of 39 ACUM cases, were also reviewed. Results: The comprehensive analysis of 39 previously reported ACUM cases and three confirmed cases from our institution revealed the following: 1. The mean age of the ACUM patients was 25.9 ± 6.5 years. 2. The primary clinical presentations of ACUM consisted of dysmenorrhea (83.3%) and lower abdominal pain (47.6%), with additional findings of dyspareunia (9.5%), difficult defecation (2.4%), and primary infertility (2.4%). 3. The ultrasonographic features are as follows: a) ACUM typically appeared as a thick-walled cystic mass not connected to the uterine cavity. b) The mean maximum outer diameter was 34.3 ± 11.7 mm (range 16-64 mm), with a median of 31.5 mm.c) The cyst was often surrounded by a homogeneous thick muscular layer (83.3%) and exhibited ring-like or semi-ring-like vascular signals (19.0%). d) The cystic cavity typically exhibited a ground-glass appearance (64.3%). e) Only seven cases (16.7%) displayed clearly identifiable endometrial lining on ultrasound examination. 4. Details of diagnostic accuracy are as follows: a) The preoperative ultrasound diagnostic concordance rate was 47.6%. b) ACUM was most frequently misdiagnosed as uterine leiomyoma (28.6%) and cystic adenomyosis (21.4%), with one case (2.4%) misdiagnosed as type II rudimentary horn uterus. Conclusion: ACUM is an exceedingly rare lesion that is particularly prone to misdiagnosis. ACUM should be considered in young female patients with severe dysmenorrhea and imaging findings of a normal uterine cavity and bilateral ovaries and a thick-walled cystic mass within the myometrium that does not communicate with the uterine cavity. Familiarity with the ultrasound manifestations of ACUM can help sonographers make timely and accurate diagnoses, assisting clinicians in choosing appropriate treatment methods and alleviating patient suffering.

Indexed as

accessory cavitated uterine malformationACUMdysmenorrheaMüllerian duct anomalyuterine diseases

Identifiers

PMID41114359
PMCPMC12531066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.