Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41114342›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2025

Algorithms on the rise: a machine learning-driven survey of prostate cancer literature.

Simin Gu, Jiajun Chen, Chunyan Fan, Xiaodong Huang, Linbo Li, Hua Zhang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. AI in Prostate Cancer Screening & Diagnosis: A Registry-Based Study of ClinicalTrials.gov Trials.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Simin GuDepartment of Urology, Qidong People's Hospital, Qidong Liver Cancer Institute, Affiliated Qidong Hospital of Nantong University, Qidong, Jiangsu, China.
Jiajun ChenDepartment of Urology, Qidong People's Hospital, Qidong Liver Cancer Institute, Affiliated Qidong Hospital of Nantong University, Qidong, Jiangsu, China.
Chunyan FanDepartment of Urology, Qidong People's Hospital, Qidong Liver Cancer Institute, Affiliated Qidong Hospital of Nantong University, Qidong, Jiangsu, China.
Xiaodong HuangDepartment of Urology, Qidong People's Hospital, Qidong Liver Cancer Institute, Affiliated Qidong Hospital of Nantong University, Qidong, Jiangsu, China.
Linbo LiCentral Laboratory, Qidong People's Hospital, Qidong Liver Cancer Institute, Affiliated Qidong Hospital of Nantong University, Qidong, Jiangsu, China.
Hua ZhangDepartment of Urology, Qidong People's Hospital, Qidong Liver Cancer Institute, Affiliated Qidong Hospital of Nantong University, Qidong, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Machine learning (ML) has shown significant potential in improving prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment planning. Despite rapid advancements, a comprehensive quantitative synthesis of global research trends and the knowledge structure of ML applications in PCa remains lacking. This study aimed to systematically map the evolution, research hotspots, and collaborative landscape of ML-PCa research. Methods: A systematic bibliometric review was performed on English-language articles and reviews published between January 2005 and December 2024. Publications were retrieved from the Web of Science (WOS) and Scopus databases. Analytical tools including CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and the R-bibliometrix package were employed to assess publication growth trends, country and institutional contributions, collaboration networks, author productivity, journal outlets, and keyword co-occurrence patterns. Results: A total of 2,632 publications were identified. Annual output increased from fewer than 20 papers during 2005-2014 to 661 in 2024, with 82% of all studies published since 2021. Emerging frontiers included deep learning, radiomics, and multimodal data fusion. China (649 publications) and the United States (492 publications) led in research volume, while Germany demonstrated the highest proportion of multinational collaboration (39.29%). Leading institutions by output were the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the University of British Columbia, and Shanghai Jiao Tong University. In terms of citation impact, the University of Toronto, Case Western Reserve University, and the University of Pennsylvania ranked highest. The journals Cancers, Frontiers in Oncology, and Scientific Reports published the most ML-PCa studies, highlighting the cross-disciplinary nature of the field. Madabhushi Anant emerged as the most central author hub in global collaboration networks. Discussion: ML applications in PCa research have experienced exponential growth, with methodological innovations driving interest in deep learning and radiomics. However, a persistent translational gap exists between algorithmic development and clinical implementation. Future directions should focus on fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, conducting prospective multicenter validation studies, and aligning with regulatory standards to accelerate the integration of ML models into clinical PCa workflows.

Indexed as

bibliometric analysisdeep learningmachine learningprostate cancerradiomicstranslational research

Identifiers

PMID41114342
PMCPMC12527887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.