ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
CT-based radiomics and deep learning to predict EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Radiomics and Deep Learning: Bridging Breast Cancer Imaging Phenotypes and Genomic Heterogeneity.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status is an essential biomarker guiding targeted therapy selection in lung adenocarcinoma. This study aimed to develop and validate a non-invasive predictive model that integrates radiomics and deep learning using CT images for accurate assessment of EGFR mutation status. Methods: A total of 220 patients with lung adenocarcinoma were retrospectively enrolled and randomly divided into training and testing cohorts at a 7:3 ratio. Radiomics features were extracted from CT images using PyRadiomics, and deep learning features were obtained from five pretrained architectures: ResNet34, ResNet152, DenseNet121, ShuffleNet, and Vision Transformer (ViT). Feature selection used the intraclass correlation coefficient, Spearman correlation, and LASSO regression. The deep learning architectures were compared within the training set using cross-validation, and the best-performing architecture, ViT, was retained for downstream modeling. Based on the selected features, we constructed a radiomics model (Rad model), a ViT-based deep learning model (ViT model), and two fusion models (early fusion and late fusion) integrating radiomics and ViT features. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, F1-score, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The fusion models outperformed both radiomics and deep learning models in predicting EGFR mutation status. In the testing set, the early fusion model achieved the highest predictive performance (AUC = 0.910), exceeding the late fusion model (AUC = 0.892), the ViT model (AUC = 0.870), and the Rad model (AUC = 0.792). It also demonstrated superior accuracy (0.848), sensitivity (0.872), and specificity (0.815). Decision curve analysis further confirmed its clinical utility. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that integrating radiomics and deep learning contributed to EGFR mutation prediction, providing a non-invasive approach to support personalized treatment decisions in lung adenocarcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.