ArticlePostepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology2025
Comparison of safety and efficiency of aortic balloon valvuloplasty performed in a free-standing catheterization laboratory and one with cardiac surgery backup.
Article in Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transcatheter aortic valve implantation without on-site surgical backup: is it time for Poland to embrace the paradigm shift?Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) is typically performed in hybrid theaters or hospitals with cardiosurgery wards. Due to limited access to these facilities, BAV may also be conducted in standalone catheterization laboratories (ASC). Aim: This study compared the safety and efficiency of BAV in ASC versus cardiac surgery-backed units (CSBU). Material and methods: This multicenter (7 sites) retrospective registry included 514 symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent BAV. Of these, 376 procedures were performed in CSBU and 138 in ASC. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar, except for a higher prevalence of CAD (ASC 63% vs. CSBU 45%, Conclusions: The safety and efficiency of BAV performed in standalone catheterization laboratories are comparable to those performed in cardiology wards with cardiac surgery backup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.