ArticlePostepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology2025
Comparative prognostic performance of the FIB-4 index versus SYNTAX and GRACE scores in predicting major cardiovascular events in acute coronary syndrome.
Article in Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, a non-invasive marker of liver fibrosis originally developed for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), has gained attention for its prognostic value in cardiovascular disease. Aim: Given the shared metabolic risk between NAFLD and acute coronary syndrome (ACS), this study aimed to evaluate the association between FIB-4 and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with ACS, in comparison with conventional risk scores. Material and methods: This is an observational cohort study included 941 patients hospitalized with ACS between 2017 and 2021. Patients were classified into three FIB-4 categories: low, < 1.45; intermediate, 1.45-3.25; and high, ≥ 3.25. Clinical, laboratory, angiographic, and echocardiographic data were collected. MACE incidence was evaluated over a median follow-up of 67.5 months. Cox regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed. Results: MACE occurred in 37.9% of patients in the high FIB-4 group, compared to 28.7% and 29.2% in the low and intermediate groups, respectively ( Conclusions: The FIB-4 index is a robust, accessible predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in ACS and may enhance conventional risk stratification strategies by integrating systemic metabolic burden into cardiovascular risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.