ArticlePostepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology2025
Clinical features and prognosis in patients with coronary anomalies: the experiences and follow-up results of a single center.
Article in Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Coronary anomalies (CAs) are rare congenital abnormalities often found incidentally on conventional coronary angiography (CCA), coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA), or autopsy. Aim: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of origin and termination coronary artery anomalies via CCTA, and to evaluate outcomes over an 8-year follow-up. Material and methods: To diagnose CAs, the CCTA data of 3017 consecutive patients who had undergone CCTA between January 2015 and January 2023 were analyzed retrospectively and followed up. Results: Among the 3017 patients, 60 (2%) had coronary anomalies. Fifty-seven (95%) patients had origin and distribution anomalies, and 3 (5%) patients had a coronary artery fistula. The most common origin anomaly (13, 21.7%) was an anomalous origin of the right coronary artery (RCA), and the second one was (12, 20%) congenital atresia of the left main artery. It was also found that among anomalies, the most common (16, 26.6%) was the anomaly of course. Statistical analysis showed that the presence of CAs did not affect the development of major cardiovascular events (MACE) or mortality ( Conclusions: In this single-center study, the prevalence of CAs (2%) and the results of MACE and mortality were similar to those reported in the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.