Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41114262›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Extrapolating Local Coupled Cluster Calculations toward CCSD(T)/CBS Binding Energies of Atmospheric Molecular Clusters.

Yosef Knattrup, Jonas Elm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yosef KnattrupDepartment of Chemistry, Aarhus University, Langelandsgade 140, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3549-7494
Jonas ElmDepartment of Chemistry, Aarhus University, Langelandsgade 140, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3736-4329

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aerosols are the largest source of uncertainty in modern global radiative forcing modeling. Atmospheric molecular clusters are important intermediates in atmospheric new particle formation (NPF). The evaporation rate of clusters can be calculated using quantum chemical methods, with an exponential dependence on the free energy. Hence, for simulating accurate NPF rates, high-accuracy calculations are needed. We have constructed a versatile benchmark set of 218 conformers of atmospheric molecular dimer clusters consisting of sulfuric acid (SA), formic acid (FA), nitric acid (NA), methanesulfonic acid (MSA), water (W), ammonia (AM), methylamine (MA), dimethylamine (DMA), trimethylamine (TMA), and ethylenediamine (EDA) molecules. Using this test set, we benchmark the local coupled cluster methods, DLPNO-CCSD-(T

Identifiers

PMID41114262
PMCPMC12529178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.