Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41114245›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Mechanism of DNA Chemical Denaturation.

Daniel A Ostrovsky, Mikhail V Ostrovsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniel A OstrovskyIndependent Researcher, Los Angeles, California 90024, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8680-7499
Mikhail V OstrovskyIndependent Researcher, Los Angeles, California 90024, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4064-8727

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed a method to evaluate the degree of influence of attraction and electrostatic repulsion forces in DNA during its chemical denaturation. Our approach shows that when a solution can split apart a target molecule, the forces inside the molecule can be deduced by analyzing the properties of the surrounding solution. Our method is suitable for selecting DNA (or other systems with controllable denaturation) targeted for specific applications or to optimize the denaturants for any given DNA. Our theory has been developed for the chemical denaturation of DNA for low- and medium-denaturation degrees, including the denaturation of 50% as a reversible first-order reaction. Specifically, we show the degrees of influence of hydrogen bonding, dispersion, polar forces, proton donor/acceptor ratio, dipole induction, orientation parameter, and electrostatic interaction on the denaturation process of DNA. The absolute enthalpy values for DNA chemical denaturation are significantly lower than those in the thermal denaturation process (where values are positive). We show that the mechanism for reaching 50% DNA denaturation differs thermally and chemically. The thermal denaturation process mainly involves breaking hydrogen bonds via heating, while the chemical denaturation process involves replacing DNA's hydrogen bonds with denaturants. We show that hydrogen bonding is the dominant enthalpic contributor to the chemical denaturation of T4 bacteriophage DNA, and the proton-donor effect is the dominant mechanism for disrupting hydrogen bonds during DNA denaturation. The influence of this effect is two times greater than that of the proton-acceptor effect. We also show that the orientation component is another essential factor for DNA denaturation, which is part of the polar cohesion parameter. We show that the total cohesion parameter measured at 50% of DNA chemical denaturation represents the electrostatic (repulsion) forces that maintain the DNA helix. The conclusions above were achieved using the cohesive energy density approach and corresponding equations based on the thermodynamics of the denaturation process. Independent experimental data, which we analyzed using our theory, support these conclusions.

Identifiers

PMID41114245
PMCPMC12529402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.