ArticleACS omega2025
Thermally Distinguishable Polyhedral Shapes in Chemistry: 6- and 7‑Coordination.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coordination polyhedra in metal complexes occasionally exhibit marked deviations from ideal geometric shapes, complicating their accurate characterization and symmetry assignment. We introduce a rigorous mathematical approach to establish a complete yet chemically relevant set of thermally distinguishable polyhedral shapes, TDPSs, suitable for describing coordination geometries, specifically focusing on coordination numbers 6 and 7. Anchored in Steinitz's theorem, we constructed all combinatorially distinct convex polyhedra and then optimized their spatial arrangements using a novel repulsive-type crowding potential, respecting maximum symmetry and minimal repulsion. Owing to thermal smearing, several of these polyhedral forms became experimentally indistinguishable within crystallographic uncertainties. Therefore, we classified these geometries into subsets of thermally interconvertible polyhedra, from which we established a concise set of thermally distinguishable polyhedral shapes. While some of these are already well-established, others represent previously unrecognized shapes in the coordination chemistry literature. Our comprehensive analysis of over 42,000 structures deposited in the Cambridge Structural Database confirmed the not infrequent occurrence of these new shapes. Remarkably, among the five thermally distinguishable shapes identified for hexacoordinated complexes, we identified the digonal anticupola (DAC-6) as a prevalent structure previously overlooked in the coordination chemistry literature. For heptacoordinated complexes, 14 thermally distinguishable polyhedral shapes emerged, including chiral and previously unrecognized shapes that we predominantly identified in lanthanide and alkali-metal complexes. This study thus establishes a robust theoretical foundation, enabling refined structural characterization, more precise symmetry assignments, and facilitating quantitative links to lattice-dynamical and thermal-transport properties (e.g., heat capacity and thermal conductivity) in molecular coordination solids.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.