ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Synchronized nutrition fertilizer improves soil microbial diversity and sugarcane yield through agrochemical and enzymatic regulation.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The new type of synchronized nutrition fertilizers (SNFert) has been popularized and applied in agro-production in northern China. However, the impacts of the SNFert on soil microbial diversity and sugarcane growth have not yet been thoroughly investigated. Methods: To clarify the influences of SNFert on soil properties, sugarcane yield, soil microbial diversity and their interactions, two years of field experiments with four treatments, including CK, non fertilizer; CF, conventional chemical fertilizer; SNF1, 15% less fertilizer applied than CF; SNF2, 25% less than CF, were conducted. Results: Results showed that yield, °Brix in the SNFert, even with 15% and 25% less fertilizer input, were no significant differences with those of CF. Specifically, SNF1 increased sugarcane yield and tillers by 6.84% and 18.63%, raised pH and urease by 0.40 units and 2.29 times, reduced Nmin and EC by 81.69% and 77.69% with 15% lower fertilizer input, respectively. In 2020, soil microbial diversity was enriched by SNFert through regulating microbial communities and functions. As a new kind of chemical fertilizer, SNF1 overcame the shortcomings of CF in reducing the soil microbial diversity, that was, there were no statistically differences in microbial alpha diversity indices between SNF1 and CK. The abundance of beneficial functional taxa Discussion: In conclusion, replacing CF with SNFert in sugarcane cultivation is an effective fertilization measure to reduce the dosage of CF, optimize soil agrochemical properties, and increase soil microbial diversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.