ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2025
A Host-Protein Test for Differentiating Bacterial From Viral Infection: Diagnostic Accuracy in Elderly Patients.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Older adults are vulnerable to infection and are difficult to diagnose. This study assessed the performance of MeMed BV (MMBV), a host-protein test for differentiating bacterial from viral infection, in adults ≥65 years. Methods: Post hoc pooled and meta-analysis of adults with suspected acute infections enrolled in 3 prospective studies. MMBV results were interpreted as bacterial/viral/equivocal per manufacturer's instructions. Reference standard infection etiology was adjudicated by experienced physicians who were blinded to MMBV. Diagnostic accuracy for bacterial infection was calculated for MMBV results (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], bin analysis) and for unequivocal MMBV results (sensitivity/specificity). MMBV's potential impact on antibiotic use was estimated by comparing MMBV-guided decisions to actual practice. Results: A total of 754 younger (18-64 years) and 248 older (≥65 years) adults were included. Among older adults, the median age was 75.0 years (IQR, 69.0, 82.0), 53.2% were male, 68.1% were hospitalized, and 79.0% had ≥3 comorbidities. Respiratory tract infections were common (76.2%), and 85.1% were prescribed antibiotics. A total of 111 patients were assigned a bacterial reference standard infection etiology, 77 a viral etiology, and 60 an indeterminate etiology. In pooled analysis, MMBV attained comparable AUC in older (0.95; 95% CI, 0.92-0.98) vs younger adults (0.95; 0.93-0.97). Focusing on older adults, 96.2% (90.3-98.8) sensitivity and 85.7% (74.8-92.5) specificity with 10.6% equivocal results were observed. MMBV could reduce potentially unwarranted antibiotic prescriptions 2.5-fold (from 62.3% to 24.7%; Conclusions: MMBV demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in older adults, supporting its potential to optimize antibiotic use in this population. Further studies are needed to evaluate real-world utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.