ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2025
Constructing a prediction model for delayed wound healing after gastric cancer radical surgery based on three machine learning algorithms.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning approaches to early detection of delayed wound healing following gastric cancer surgery.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Beyond the blank page: Frequentist and Bayesian perspectives on risk prediction algorithms.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDelayed wound healing is a common clinical complication following gastric cancer radical surgery, adversely affecting patient prognosis. With advances in artificial intelligence, machine learning offers a promising approach for developing predictive models that can identify high-risk patients and support early clinical intervention.
aimTo construct machine learning-based risk prediction models for delayed wound healing after gastric cancer surgery to support clinical decision-making.
methodsWe reviewed a total of 514 patients who underwent gastric cancer radical surgery under general anesthesia from January 1, 2014 to December 30, 2023. Seventy percent of the dataset was selected as the training set and 30% as the validation set. Decision trees, support vector machines, and logistic regression were used to construct a risk prediction model. The performance of the model was evaluated using accuracy, recall, precision, F1 index, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and decision curve.
resultsThis study included five variables: Sex, elderly, duration of abdominal drainage, preoperative white blood cell (WBC) count, and absolute value of neutrophils. These variables were selected based on their clinical relevance and statistical significance in predicting delayed wound healing. The results showed that the decision tree model outperformed the logistic regression and support vector machine models in both the training and validation sets. Specifically, the decision tree model achieved higher accuracy, F1 index, recall, and area under the curve (AUC) values. The support vector machine model also demonstrated better performance than logistic regression, with higher accuracy, recall, and F1 index, but a slightly lower AUC. The key variables of sex, elderly, duration of abdominal drainage, preoperative WBC count, and absolute value of neutrophils were found to be strong predictors of delayed wound healing. Patients with longer duration of abdominal drainage had a significantly higher risk of delayed wound healing, with a risk ratio of 1.579 compared to those with shorter duration of abdominal drainage. Similarly, preoperative WBC count, sex, elderly, and absolute value of neutrophils were associated with a higher risk of delayed wound healing, highlighting the importance of these variables in the model.
conclusionThe model is able to identify high-risk patients based on sex, elderly, duration of abdominal drainage, preoperative WBC count, and absolute value of neutrophils can provide valuable insights for clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.