ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2025
Clinical outcomes of nursing interventions after endoscopic treatment for intestinal polyps and early-stage cancer.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImplementing nursing interventions in patients undergoing endoscopic treatment for intestinal polyps and early stage cancer can serve as a reference for reducing the incidence of complications, accelerating the recovery process, and improving the quality of life.
aimTo impact of systematic nursing intervention on recovery, complications prevention, and quality of life after endoscopic surgery for intestinal polyps.
methodsThis retrospective study included 157 patients who underwent endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection at our hospital. The patients were divided into intervention and conventional groups, with no significant differences in age, sex, or surgical methods. The intervention group received multidimensional nursing interventions, including preoperative evaluation, intraoperative cooperation, postoperative rehabilitation, psychological support and nutritional management. The conventional group received standardized care. Clinical efficacy, inflammation and infection indicators, complication rates, rehabilitation indicators, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were compared.
resultsOn the 7
conclusionMultidimensional nursing interventions have clinical value in endoscopic treatment of intestinal polyps and early stage cancer, reducing complications and hospital stay. This study provides a basis for establishing patient-centered guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.