ReviewJournal of diabetes and metabolic disorders2025
The lived reality of diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-synthesis on patients' experiences and coping for a high-quality life.
Review in Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Educational Attainment and Diabetic Foot Ulceration: Outcomes From the Barbados Diabetic Foot Study.International wound journal · 2026Observational
- Staged antibiotic-loaded cement-based reconstruction versus flap-based reconstruction for complex diabetic foot defects in patients with osteoporosis: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a severe complication of diabetes mellitus, leading to infection, amputation, and reduced quality of life. Beyond their clinical impact, DFUs impose psychological, social, and economic burdens on affected individuals. Despite extensive research on DFU prevention and management, the lived experiences of those suffering from DFUs remain underexplored. Understanding these experiences is essential for improving patient-centered interventions and holistic care approaches. Methods: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies were conducted following PRISMA and ENTREQ guidelines. A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science from 2020 to 2024. Studies were selected based on the SPIDER framework, focusing on adults with DFUs and their lived experiences. Noblit and Hare's meta-ethnographic approach was used to synthesize data, identifying first-, second-, and third-order constructs. Thematic synthesis was applied to extract key challenges, coping strategies, and resilience factors from the included studies. Results: The analysis included 27 studies with 576 participants and identified four uplifting themes: (1) Rising Above Daily Challenges with DFUs, showing how people stay active, turn struggles into strengths, and care for their feet with pride; (2) Moving Forward Through Uncertainty and Connection, highlighting hope, teamwork with others, and efforts to find helpful information; (3) Embracing a New Way of Living, reflecting creative solutions, joy in fresh starts, and welcoming support; and (4) Growing Stronger with Purpose and Support, capturing personal growth and building encouraging relationships. These themes reveal the many ways participants shine through their experiences. Conclusion: This meta-synthesis underscores the complex, multifaceted impact of DFUs beyond the physical wound, emphasizing the necessity of holistic, patient-centered care. Enhancing communication, addressing psychosocial challenges, and integrating support systems can improve outcomes and quality of life for DFU patients. Future research should focus on culturally tailored interventions and longitudinal studies to track resilience over time. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-025-01726-1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.