Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41114027›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

The correlation between the styloid process length, angle, head shape, and eagle syndrome based on high-resolution CT three-dimensional reconstruction: a retrospective study.

Jiaqi Duan, Fang Wu, Linfeng Liu, Jianxia Xu, Xiaozhong Zheng, Shufeng Fan, Qinpan Rao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jiaqi DuanThe Second School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Fang WuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Linfeng LiuDepartment of Radiology, The Songyang County Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Lishui, Zhejiang, China.
Jianxia XuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xiaozhong ZhengDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Shufeng FanDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Qinpan RaoDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: A comprehensive evaluation index (R value) based on the styloid process (SP) length and spatial angle orientation was constructed to explore the imaging and clinical features of Eagle Syndrome, and assess its diagnostic value in the identification of Eagle Syndrome. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the high-resolution CT (HRCT) three-dimensional reconstruction maximum intensity projection (MIP), with a data of 57 clinically diagnosed Eagle Syndrome (ES group) and 49 Non Eagle Syndrome (NES group). The bilateral SP length, inward angulation, and forward tilt angle were measured. A comprehensive evaluation index, the R value, was introduced based on the head shape. Independent two-sample t-tests were used to compare the differences in parameters between the two groups, and ROC curve analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic efficacy of the R value. Finally, binary logistic regression was employed to validate the stability of the model. Results: The ES Group exhibited significantly higher parameters compared to the NES Group in terms of SP length (left: 34.19 ± 5.14 mm, right: 34.13 ± 6.40 mm), inward angulation (left: 24.29° ± 3.09°, right: 22.22° ± 3.18°), and forward tilt angle (left: 28.39 ± 2.76°, right: 28.29 ± 2.72°). The ROC curve analysis of the R value showed that the left side had a AUC of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.79-0.93), with an optimal cutoff value of 2.85, sensitivity of 82.5%, and specificity of 79.6%. The right side had an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.74-0.90), with an optimal cutoff value of 2.72, sensitivity of 78.9%, and specificity of 75.5%. The binary logistic regression results demonstrated that the R value exhibits excellent discriminative ability in the diagnosis of Eagle Syndrome. In particular, when the left R > 2.85 and/or right R > 2.72, Eagle Syndrome should be strongly suspected, and a precise diagnosis should be made in combination with clinical symptoms. Conclusion: Eagle Syndrome is closely related to the length and angle of the SP. The R value, as a composite evaluation index integrating key anatomical parameters such as length and angle, demonstrates high diagnostic efficacy and significant clinical utility. Moreover, R value (The left R > 2.85 and/or right R > 2.72) can be applied as quantitative reference criteria for diagnosis.

Indexed as

eagle syndromehead shapeHRCTlogistic regression analysisstyloid process

Identifiers

PMID41114027
PMCPMC12529820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.