ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
An auxiliary diagnostic model based on joint learning of brain and lung data.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence has significantly improved diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in medical imaging-assisted diagnosis. However, existing systems often focus on a single disease, neglecting the pathological connections between diseases. To fully leverage multi-disease information, this paper proposes an auxiliary diagnostic model based on joint learning of brain and lung data (ADMBLD), aiming to enhance the comprehensiveness and accuracy of diagnoses through cross-disease correlation learning. The model integrates imaging data and clinical history of brain and lung diseases to identify potential correlations between different diseases. Experimental results show that the model trained on both brain and lung data outperforms those trained separately, validating the effectiveness of the multi-disease joint learning diagnostic model. This confirms that integrating multi-disease information captures latent pathological relationships, overcoming the limitations of single-disease models, thereby providing clinicians with more precise and comprehensive diagnostic support and demonstrating its potential in advancing intelligent diagnostic systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.