ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Fetal head station during artificial rupture of membranes: a large retrospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Artificial rupture of membranes (AROM) is a common intervention during delivery, usually done in order to expedite delivery. Studies to determine optimal timing of AROM according to cervical dilation were inconclusive. However, other important factors, which are known to be associated with timing of delivery were ignored. One of these factors is fetal head station (FHS). We sought to investigate the association between FHS during AROM and time to delivery and other obstetrical outcomes. Material and methods: A retrospective cohort study encompassing data from labors during a 12-year period were analyzed. All cases of singleton, term pregnancy with documented AROM time were included. The study population was stratified by parity. Results: This study cohort included 45,898 singleton, term vaginal delivery parturients with time stamp at time of AROM and delivery. Stratification by parity yielded 11,947 primiparas (26%) and 33,951 multiparas (74%). Across all sub-cohorts, as fetal head station decreased at AROM the duration from ROM to delivery was shorter. This trend seems to be stronger for multiparas than primiparas. Rates of cesarean delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and low 5-min Apgar scores were also negatively associated with decrease in fetal head station at AROM across all cervical dilations. Conclusion: Lower fetal head station at AROM is associated with shorter time to delivery as well as lower rates of cesarean delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, NICU admission, and 5-min Apgar ≤ 7. Fetal head station should be considered alongside cervical dilation during AROM. Our findings underscore the necessity for personalized timing of AROM, especially in multiparous women, to enhance maternal and neonatal health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.