Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41113971›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2025

Prediction of pediatric Wilms tumor recurrence using interpretable machine learning models: insights from a 20-year real-world study and the prognostic value of Ki-67.

Honggang Fang, Yihang Yu, Junjun Dong, Zehang Chen, Fei Liu, Zhong Liu, Qi Li, Xing Liu, Tao Lin, Dawei He and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Honggang FangDepartment of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing 401122, China.
Yihang YuDepartment of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing 401122, China.
Junjun DongDepartment of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing 401122, China.
Zehang ChenSchool of Economics and Business Administration, Chongqing University Chongqing 400030, China.
Fei LiuSchool of Economics and Business Administration, Chongqing University Chongqing 400030, China.
Zhong LiuDepartment of Urology, Jiangxi Children's Medical Center Nanchang 330200, Jiangxi, China.
Qi LiSchool of Finance, Chongqing Technology and Business University Chongqing 400067, China.
Xing LiuDepartment of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing 401122, China.
Tao LinDepartment of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing 401122, China.
Dawei HeDepartment of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing 401122, China.
Guanghui WeiDepartment of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing 401122, China.
Deying ZhangDepartment of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing 401122, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite overall survival exceeding 80% in Wilms tumor (WT), approximately 15% of pediatric patients experience recurrence with poor post-relapse survival (~50%) and significant long-term complications, highlighting an unmet need for precise recurrence prediction. To address this, we developed and validated machine learning (ML) models for predicting postoperative WT recurrence using real-world clinical data. Among 476 pediatric WT patients who underwent radical surgery at our institution (June 2004-June 2024), 351 met inclusion criteria and were randomized into training (70%) and validation (30%) cohorts. Seven independent predictors - COG tumor stage, age, tumor rupture, histological subtype (COG classification), tumor thrombus, tumor volume, and Ki-67 index - were identified via feature selection intersection of Boruta, LASSO, subgroup analysis, and univariate logistic regression. Predictive models were constructed using nine ML algorithms (DT, LASSO, KNN, LightGBM, LR, MLP, RF, SVM, XGBoost), with performance evaluated using metrics such as AUC, accuracy, F1 score, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and confusion matrix. Among the included patients, 51 (14.53%) experienced tumor recurrence (including 7 multi-site relapses), with median time to recurrence 6 months (IQR 4-16 months) and 80.4% occurring within the first postoperative year. In the validation cohort, the SVM model demonstrated the best performance (AUC = 0.851; accuracy = 0.830; specificity = 0.856; F1 = 0.550; PPV = 0.458; NPV = 0.939), and SHAP analysis highlighted unfavorable histology, COG stage IV-V, tumor thrombus, and elevated Ki-67 index as the strongest contributors to recurrence risk. This interpretable SVM-based model confirms seven key predictors - especially the Ki-67 index - and serves as a practical risk stratification tool to support individualized follow-up planning.

Indexed as

feature selectionmachine learningSHAP interpretationsupport vector machinetumor recurrence predictionWilms tumor

Identifiers

PMID41113971
PMCPMC12531292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.