ReviewAddiction & health2025
Navigating Challenges in Tobacco Control: A Systematic Review of Barriers to Implementing Article 5.3 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC).
Review in Addiction & health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Improving legislation is a necessity: A multi-method quantitative analysis of tobacco sponsorship and publicity in China.Tobacco induced diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tobacco control efforts face substantial obstacles from industry interference and regulatory weaknesses. This review synthesizes qualitative evidence on barriers to implementing effective tobacco control measures, offering actionable recommendations for policymakers and practitioners. Objective: To identify barriers to implementing tobacco control measures, specifically Article 5.3 of the WHO FCTC, and propose solutions to overcome them. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, EBSCO, and the Cochrane Library, using keywords like "tobacco," "industry," and "interference." The search, limited to English-language studies published until July 15, 2024, included qualitative studies addressing barriers to implementing Article 5.3. Eligible studies focused on government policies, institutional actions, economic measures, and public awareness. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024565548). Study quality was assessed using the CASP checklist, and confidence in findings was evaluated with GRADE-CERQual. Findings: Twelve qualitative studies were included, covering regions such as Bangladesh, Ethiopia, India, Uganda, and the UK Overseas Territories. Key barriers identified were conflicts of interest involving government officials, lobbying by the tobacco industry, resource constraints, weak regulatory frameworks, and limited awareness of Article 5.3. Economic considerations often overshadowed public health priorities, further enabling industry influence. Conclusion: Addressing these barriers requires strengthened regulations, improved coordination, and enhanced support for tobacco control initiatives. Efforts should prioritize reducing conflicts of interest, increasing awareness of Article 5.3, and balancing public health and economic interests. Public health dentists and policymakers must collaborate to ensure effective tobacco control measures are implemented and sustained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.