Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41113897›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Reliability of Ultrasound Features in Predicting Thyroid Malignancy.

Sushmitha D J, Rahul A V, Kiran Shankar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sushmitha D JSurgical Oncology, Cauvery Heart and Multi-Speciality Hospital, Mysuru, IND.
Rahul A VMedicine, Maurya Multispeciality Hospital Mysuru, Mysuru, IND.
Kiran ShankarSurgical Oncology, Cauvery Heart and Multi-Speciality Hospital, Mysuru, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMETHODOLOGY: Between August 2015 and December 2022, 313 consecutive patients with thyroid nodules presenting to the Surgical Department were screened; out of these, 146 patients underwent surgery

resultsUsing ultrasound diagnostic criteria, 112 patients were classified as positive, and histopathology later confirmed that 84 of these had malignancies. This showed a sensitivity of 95.45%, a specificity of 51%, and a positive predictive value of 75%. Further analysis via the ROC curve showed a high malignancy probability at a point that corresponds to the presence of the 2 ultrasound characteristics, i.e., irregular margin and microcalcification. Specificity and sensitivity at this point are 73.5 and 74.4, respectively.

conclusionThe predefined rule using ≥2 features showed high sensitivity for detecting malignant thyroid nodules, making it useful for screening. The presence of irregular margins and microcalcifications (M + C pair) provided a more balanced sensitivity-specificity trade-off, supporting its use for risk stratification rather than direct surgical decision-making. While these ultrasound criteria show strong diagnostic performance, definitive management decisions should continue to rely on multidisciplinary assessment, integrating cytology, clinical findings, and patient factors. Further prospective validation in larger, unselected cohorts is recommended to refine threshold criteria and confirm generalizability.

Indexed as

onco-surgeryradio diagnosisthyroid cancer surgerythyroid nodule sizeultrasound neck

Identifiers

PMID41113897
PMCPMC12535271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.