ReviewCureus2025
Outcomes Following Vascularised Bone Graft for the Treatment of Upper Limb Osteomyelitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteomyelitis is a debilitating condition with treatment options ranging from antibiotics to surgical management. In cases where debridement of necrotic or infected tissue results in extensive bone and soft-tissue loss, creating a poorly vascularised cavity prone to persistent infection and mechanical instability, vascularised bone grafts (VBGs) can provide definitive reconstruction. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess outcomes of VBGs for upper limb osteomyelitis. A systematic search of electronic databases identified 330 papers related to VBGs, of which 10 retrospective case series met the inclusion criteria, cumulatively including 70 patients. Statistical analysis was performed using Open MetaAnalyst software (Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI, US) with a random-effects model and 95% confidence intervals. The mean time to bony union post-VBG was 6.2 months, with 59 (87.7%) patients achieving union. Secondary surgery was required for 19 (26.1%) patients, and postoperative infection recurrence occurred in three (5.1%). Postoperative stress fracture was reported in one case with an overall incidence of 5.5%. These findings indicate that VBGs are an effective treatment for upper limb osteomyelitis, yielding high rates of bony union and a low incidence of complications. Compared with other treatment modalities, patients undergoing VBGs may benefit from shorter antibiotic courses and improved outcomes. Whilst the included studies were limited to retrospective series, this pooled analysis provides evidence supporting the use of VBGs as a reliable surgical option for complex upper limb osteomyelitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.