Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41113875›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Transplanting Against the Gradient: Invasive Evaluation of Resting and Dynamic Left Ventricular Outflow Tract (LVOT) Obstruction in a Liver Transplant Candidate.

Hugh Slifirski, Laurence Weinberg, Nattaya Raykateeraroj, Jemin A Suh, Anoop N Koshy, Dong-Kyu Lee

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hugh SlifirskiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Austin Health, Melbourne, AUS.
Laurence WeinbergDepartment of Anesthesiology, Austin Health, Melbourne, AUS.
Nattaya RaykateerarojDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, THA.
Jemin A SuhDepartment of Anesthesiology, Austin Health, Melbourne, AUS.
Anoop N KoshyDepartment of Cardiology, Austin Health, Melbourne, AUS.
Dong-Kyu LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, PRK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction remains a clinically significant perioperative risk factor in candidates for liver transplantation (LT). Among patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD), conventional resting echocardiography may inadequately characterize the hemodynamic burden of provoked LVOT obstruction, resulting in incomplete cardiovascular risk stratification before transplantation. This report details the use of an invasive preload-provocation fluid challenge to distinguish dynamic from fixed LVOT obstruction, thereby directly impacting anesthetic planning and transplant candidacy. A 69-year-old female patient with drug-induced ESLD displayed a resting transthoracic LVOT gradient of 84 mmHg while on beta-blocker therapy. Cardiac catheterization revealed a baseline intracavitary mid-cavity-to-LVOT gradient of 60 mmHg. Administration of a 500 mL 5% albumin preload over 10 minutes resulted in a reduction of the gradient to 16 mmHg, confirming a load-dependent dynamic obstruction consistent with ESLD physiology rather than fixed LVOT obstruction. Following reassessment, the patient successfully underwent LT utilizing advanced invasive hemodynamic monitoring. Anesthetic management prioritized afterload support and meticulously controlled volume administration, yielding intraoperative cardiovascular stability. Postoperatively, echocardiography demonstrated resolution of LVOT gradients and preserved graft function at six months. This proof-of-concept case underscores the utility of a standardized invasive preload challenge in distinguishing dynamic from fixed LVOT obstruction and guiding perioperative strategy. In the presence of preload-responsive gradients and careful afterload maintenance, LVOT obstruction should not be considered an absolute contraindication to LT. Integration of this diagnostic approach into pre-transplant assessment protocols may refine cardiovascular risk stratification and expand LT eligibility among patients presenting with this unique hemodynamic profile.

Indexed as

diagnostic work upfluid responsivenessleft ventricular outflow tract (lvot) obstructionliver transplantationorthotopic liver transplantationrisk stratify

Identifiers

PMID41113875
PMCPMC12529892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.