Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41113852›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of palliative care

End-of-Life Care Preferences of Terminally Ill Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.

E Devakirubai, Angela Gnanadurai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of palliative care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

E DevakirubaiSacred Heart Nursing College, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Angela GnanaduraiJubilee College of Nursing, Trissur, Kerala, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Providing excellent care for a dying patient is something all patients deserve. The Institute of Medicine Committee defined good death as one that is in accord with the patient's and family's wishes. End-of-Life (EOL) care preferences of terminally ill patients vary with culture, which is reported by various researchers around the globe. The aim of the study was to explore the EOL care preferences among terminally ill patients from a selected setting in Tamil Nadu, India. Materials and Methods: A descriptive design was adopted. 120 terminally ill patients were interviewed using a structured questionnaire on EOL care preferences in a selected hospice. Results: EOL is a naive concept in India; interestingly, 16.6% had communicated their EOL wishes to family members. Terminally ill patients valued a sense of dignity more than controlling pain through medications if it muddled them. Nearly 72.5% of patients did not prefer life-prolonging treatment if they did not have a hope of recovery. Nearly 40.83% and 77.5% of patients preferred home for EOL care and death, respectively. Nearly 73.33% of patients preferred that their spiritual beliefs be considered for EOL care. Majority preferred to fill out a living will or an advanced directive. 40.83% agreed that euthanasia to be legally available. Conclusion: EOL care preferences vary in different cultures and crafting EOL care pathways tailored to cultural preferences will enhance the quality of EOL care. Persistent investment in EOL research promises to pave the way for superior EOL care standards in India.

Indexed as

CultureEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life carePreferencesTerminally ill patients

Identifiers

PMID41113852
PMCPMC12530832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.