Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41113830›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Fair allocation of telemedical counseling services in early detection of Alzheimer's disease: Empirically informed ethical considerations.

Felix Roth, Silke Schicktanz, Julia Perry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Felix RothDepartment of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine University Medical Center Goettingen Goettingen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4019-3066
Silke SchicktanzDepartment of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine University Medical Center Goettingen Goettingen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9627-752X
Julia PerryDepartment of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine University Medical Center Goettingen Goettingen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8112-0298

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCounseling for early Alzheimer's disease (AD) detection is essential, especially regarding emerging blood-based biomarkers. The increasing need for counseling requires innovative approaches and simultaneously consideration of ethical issues. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: Telemedicine is discussed as a means of providing more accessible and fairer health care. Nevertheless, barriers to accessing telemedicine are important to consider, such as required technical hardware and ethical criteria regarding interpersonal counseling, including individual adaptation of information to ensure self-determined decision-making. Regarding resource allocation, issues must be considered before telemedicine is implemented. THEORETICAL REFLECTION: Fair counseling structures require the discussion of resource allocation. To avoid justifying telemedical counseling based solely on cost-effectiveness and overlooking further ethical demands, we propose a ranked approach. To strengthening self-determined decisions, we argue that equal care structures can be built on these prerequisite aspects and enable realization of fair resource allocation as a last step. Highlights: Blood-based biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease (AD) facilitate easier access to risk assessment and early detection. Currently, insufficient pre-diagnostic counseling structures exist which support informed decision-making. Telemedicine may be a meaningful approach for innovative counseling services. However, unresolved ethical and legal issues regarding telemedical counseling services for the early detection of AD must first be addressed.Telemedical counseling in the early detection of AD is yet rarely discussed in the literature. Therefore, we combine insights from ethical analysis of telemedical counseling with the ethical issues of fair and empowering counseling in the early detection of AD separately. In a second step, we discuss the use of telemedical counseling for the early detection of AD inductively to highlight ethically relevant aspects and present our considerations in light of the principles of autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice.To provide ethical guidance for possible future implementation without overprioritizing one approach to counseling for the early detection of AD, considerations regarding fair resource allocation are required. We argue that three major ethical topics should be considered in the future: Strengthening individuals' autonomy, equal care structures, and fair resource allocation.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseaseearly detectionethicsfair resource allocationtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID41113830
PMCPMC12531415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.