ArticleClinical & translational immunology2025
Genome-wide association study and polygenic risk scores of eosinophilia in Taiwan.
Article in Clinical & translational immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Eosinophilia, characterised by elevated eosinophil levels, is associated with various allergic and inflammatory conditions. This study aimed to elucidate the genetic determinants of eosinophil levels by examining polygenic risk scores (PRS) and identifying significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Methods: We conducted a comprehensive genome-wide association study (GWAS) on eosinophil levels using a large cohort, comprising 221 851 controls (eosinophil levels ≤ 5%) and 11 200 cases (eosinophil levels > 5%) in Taiwan. The analysis included covariates such as age, sex and the first 10 principal components to account for population stratification. Polygenic risk scores were calculated, and their associations with eosinophil levels were evaluated. Results: The control group exhibited a mean eosinophil level of 47.81 (SD, 21.08) and was composed of 55.32% females and 44.68% males. The case group had a mean eosinophil level of 43.27 (SD, 22.27) and consisted of 38.6% females and 61.4% males. The GWAS identified several SNPs with significant associations, including rs7646596, rs8191981, rs140105250, rs77143352, rs12535759, rs11327184, rs16917546, rs76738175, rs11568075, rs9557175 and rs2801127, with rs7646596 showing the most significant Conclusion: This study identified several genetic loci significantly associated with eosinophil levels, highlighting the polygenic nature of eosinophilia. The robust associations, particularly with SNP rs7646596, offer valuable insights into the genetic underpinnings of eosinophilia and related conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.