ArticleFrontiers in health services2025
Development of methods for WHO quality standards for child and youth mental health services to improve quality of care and patient safety in the WHO European region.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Child and youth mental health care is of varying quality across the WHO European Region, with many settings being low-resourced. To improve and standardize quality of care, WHO Regional Office for Europe is developing quality standards for child and youth mental health services. This research aims to develop evidence informed methods to develop these quality standards. Methods: Desk reviews of grey literature aimed to understand what approaches have been used or recommended to develop quality standards for child and youth mental health/health for use across a range of different countries, and consultation was sought from an expert steering group. A thematic approach was used to synthesize relevant themes. The methods were developed based on the results of these steps. Results: Desk reviews identified variation in approaches used and recommended to develop quality standards, with limited available guidance applicable across different resource settings. Nine key themes from stakeholder consultations were highlighted. Based on these results, a seven-step methodology was created to develop the quality standards for child and youth mental health which prioritizes using an evidence-based approach and inputs from a wide range of stakeholders. Discussion: The methods taken to develop quality standards need to be rigorous to ensure that standards accurately define high-quality care for a service. There is a need to develop a unified approach to developing quality standards. It is hoped that this paper will provide inspiration for others developing quality standards for child and youth mental health services and spark research in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.